The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire Essay -- World Hist

The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire In this paper I will explain why revolt by the labor against capitalin Second Empire France failed. To explain the military position, I will useMarxs possibility of capital accumulation as he presents it in Capital. Alsoimportant in the theoretical description of this phenomena is the role oftradition and the way its restraints influence from those of the economy inthis French society. Based on this description I will discuss how thefunction of management is enforced by the economy and traditions built-inin a society. From these considerations I will suggest additional elementsand relationships necessary for social relations change to transcend theinstitutional conditions in which they exist. Terminology relevent to a theoretical account of an event is given byTalcott Parsons in The Structure of Social Action. Here, action isdescribed as a system that whitethorn be divided into unit acts. The unit actconsists of four e lements. First there is an agent, or actor. Second, theact has an end which is a future state of personal matters or goal towards which theaction is oriented. Third, there is a situation where the trends ofdevelop- ment differ from the end towards which the action is oriented. Thesituation is composed of two elements the conditions are that which theactor cannot ensure in accordance with his end, and the means are thatover which he does not have control. Finally there is a relation betweenthese elements where a situation allows alterna- tive means to the end,the course is selected from the normative orientation of the actor.(Parsons, 1968 44) In order to account for the interrelationships in the historical event... ... change. Events willsubsequently no longer take chances but attain meaning in the light of the sourcethat the charismatic element advocates. This change in normativeorientations relative to the change in separate elements of the process mustbe reflected in the ideology. The ideology of social change may not simplybe a reiffication of the old in a reactionary form. The substance of theideology, in being a response to the divergence caused by the economy andpolity, must be such as to transcend that which came in the lead it. This finalcondition, specifying the relations between elements necessary forrevolutionary change, may only be derived in a society which is neither anorganic, composite whole nor atomic number 53 of random atomistic ends. Rather, thesociety must be one where the normative orientation for mediating betweenconditions and means is one of consensus.